Chi Ma

2.8k citations
80 papers · 2.1k · h-index 23

Impact in

    • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Urology top 2%
    • Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Papers in

Chi Ma

80 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Chi Ma
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Biomaterials 460
  • Urology 171
  • Oral Surgery 156
  • Biophysics 125
  • Molecular Medicine 85
Replace Young‐Kwon Seo with:
Young‐Kwon Seo South Korea
Cristiane Miranda França Brazil
Petek Korkusuz Türkiye
Je‐Ken Chang Taiwan
Thor Friis Australia
Virginie Sottile United Kingdom
Yu‐Shik Hwang South Korea
Gwo‐Jaw Wang Taiwan
Chiara E. Ghezzi United States
Miya Ishihara Japan
Chi Ma relative to Young‐Kwon Seo South Korea Young‐Kwon Seo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Young‐Kwon Seo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chi Ma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi Ma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi Ma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi Ma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi Ma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi Ma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi Ma. The network helps show where Chi Ma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chi Ma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chi Ma Line = papers co-authored together Chi Ma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018266
2 2016202
3 2017158
4 2014133
5 201692
6 202076
7 201575
8 201567
9 201758
10 201849
11 201346
12 201846
13 201442
14 201941
15 201340
16 201839
17 201637
18 201934
19 202132
20 201028

About Chi Ma

Chi Ma is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (11 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (10 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (10 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (7 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (6 papers), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (5 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (5 papers) and Bone and Joint Diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (460 citations), Urology (171 citations), Oral Surgery (156 citations), Biophysics (125 citations) and Molecular Medicine (85 citations). Chi Ma has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Xiaohua Liu, Bei Chang, Hongchen Sun, Neelam Ahuja, Jian Q. Feng, Tiejun Qu, Zhiai Hu, Yan Jing, Xin Rong and Shujuan Zou. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Biomaterialia, Advanced Healthcare Materials, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, The FASEB Journal and Journal of Polymer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact