Cherica Tee
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research 6
- Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies 2
-
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 4
- Co-authors
- Michael Tee (10 shared papers)Patrick Wincy C. Reyes (4 shared papers)Roger Ho (3 shared papers)Vipat Kuruchittham (2 shared papers)Cuiyan Wang (1 shared paper)Xiaoyang Wan (1 shared paper)Linkang Xu (1 shared paper)Cyrus S. H. Ho (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (2 papers)Journal of Affective Disorders (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)The Open Rheumatology Journal (1 paper)Open Access Rheumatology Research and Reviews (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- PhilippinesSingaporeChina
In The Last Decade
Cherica Tee
11 papers receiving 540 citations
Cherica Tee's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Clinical Psychology 355
- Applied Psychology 45
- Social Psychology 95
- Modeling and Simulation 20
- Health 31
Countries citing papers authored by Cherica Tee
This map shows the geographic impact of Cherica Tee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cherica Tee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cherica Tee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cherica Tee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cherica Tee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cherica Tee. The network helps show where Cherica Tee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Cherica Tee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 436 |
| 2 | 2020 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 6 | Retinopathy in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus | 2009 | 3 |
| 7 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 0 |
About Cherica Tee
Cherica Tee is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Clinical Psychology, Hematology, Economics and Econometrics and Immunology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (6 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (2 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (2 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (2 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (355 citations), Applied Psychology (45 citations), Social Psychology (95 citations), Modeling and Simulation (20 citations) and Health (31 citations). Cherica Tee has collaborated with scholars based in Philippines, Singapore and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael Tee, Patrick Wincy C. Reyes, Roger Ho, Vipat Kuruchittham, Cuiyan Wang, Xiaoyang Wan, Linkang Xu, Cyrus S. H. Ho, Yilin Tan and Leonila F. Dans. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Journal of Affective Disorders, Frontiers in Psychiatry, The Open Rheumatology Journal and Open Access Rheumatology Research and Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.