Chen‐Yang Jia
Impact in
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthesis and biological activity
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
- Click Chemistry and Applications
Papers in
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 6
-
- Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research 1
- Co-authors
- Guang‐Fu Yang (10 shared papers)Ge‐Fei Hao (9 shared papers)Jingyi Li (1 shared paper)Fan Wang (5 shared papers)Jing‐Fang Yang (4 shared papers)Xing-Xing Shi (2 shared papers)Mengyao Wang (3 shared papers)Fengxu Wu (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (2 papers)Fitoterapia (1 paper)Pest Management Science (1 paper)European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Drug Discovery Today (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChinaMontenegroUnited States
In The Last Decade
Chen‐Yang Jia
12 papers receiving 900 citations
Chen‐Yang Jia's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 277
- Organic Chemistry 255
- Toxicology 28
- Pharmacology 64
- Pharmacology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Chen‐Yang Jia
This map shows the geographic impact of Chen‐Yang Jia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen‐Yang Jia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen‐Yang Jia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chen‐Yang Jia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen‐Yang Jia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen‐Yang Jia. The network helps show where Chen‐Yang Jia may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen‐Yang Jia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A drug-likeness toolbox facilitates ADMET study in drug discovery Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 389 |
| 2 | 2020 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 8 |
About Chen‐Yang Jia
Chen‐Yang Jia is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Toxicology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 913 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (2 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (1 paper), Software System Performance and Reliability (1 paper), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper) and Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (277 citations), Organic Chemistry (255 citations), Toxicology (28 citations), Pharmacology (64 citations) and Pharmacology (95 citations). Chen‐Yang Jia has collaborated with scholars based in China, Montenegro and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guang‐Fu Yang, Ge‐Fei Hao, Jingyi Li, Fan Wang, Jing‐Fang Yang, Xing-Xing Shi, Mengyao Wang, Fengxu Wu, Ming‐Zhi Zhang and Weihua Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Briefings in Bioinformatics, Fitoterapia, Pest Management Science, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.