Chen‐Pin Wang

96 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Chen‐Pin Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 115
  • Aging 30
  • Statistics and Probability 100
  • Epidemiology 358
  • Applied Psychology 44
Replace Nicola N Doherty with:
Nicola N Doherty United Kingdom
Catherine Evans United Kingdom
Börge Schmidt Germany
Patricia P. Chang United States
Joni Valdemar Lindbohm Finland
Igor Karp Canada
Daniel F. Sarpong United States
Stacey B. Whitbourne United States
Emily Cox Australia
Dhayana Dallmeier Germany
Chen‐Pin Wang relative to Nicola N Doherty United Kingdom Nicola N Doherty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Nicola N Doherty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen‐Pin Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen‐Pin Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen‐Pin Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen‐Pin Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen‐Pin Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen‐Pin Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen‐Pin Wang. The network helps show where Chen‐Pin Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen‐Pin Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen‐Pin Wang Line = papers co-authored together Chen‐Pin Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005195
2 2005155
3 2013116
4 2017112
5 202074
6 201564
7 201062
8 201660
9 200756
10
Frailty Attenuates the Impact of Metformin on Reducing Mortality in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.
201452
11 201251
12 201649
13 201047
14 201945
15 201140
16 202239
17 202135
18 202231
19 202131
20 201930

About Chen‐Pin Wang

Chen‐Pin Wang is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (10 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (6 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (5 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (115 citations), Aging (30 citations), Statistics and Probability (100 citations), Epidemiology (358 citations) and Applied Psychology (44 citations). Chen‐Pin Wang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Mary Jo Pugh, Sara E Espinoza, Carlos Lorenzo, C. Hendricks Brown, Karen Bandeen‐Roche, Booil Jo, Laurel Anne Copeland, Paul E. Greenbaum, Mark S. Goldman and Frances K. Del Boca. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Diabetes Care, PLoS ONE and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact