Cheng–Ping Chen

1.6k citations
25 papers · 1.4k · h-index 16

Impact in

  • Ecology top 2%
    • Physiological and biochemical adaptations
    • Insect behavior and control techniques
    • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control

Papers in

Cheng–Ping Chen

24 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Cheng–Ping Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Ecology 1k
  • Insect Science 125
  • Parasitology 29
  • Aging 7
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 34
Replace Karl H. Joplin with:
Karl H. Joplin United States
Laura Vesala Finland
Lucie Kučerová Czechia
Nicolas O. Rode France
Alex S. Torson United States
Timothy S. Larkin United States
Manolis Lirakis Austria
Jon Martin Australia
Seanna J. McTaggart United Kingdom
Lisa L. Drake United States
Cheng–Ping Chen relative to Karl H. Joplin United States Karl H. Joplin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Karl H. Joplin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng–Ping Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng–Ping Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng–Ping Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng–Ping Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng–Ping Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng–Ping Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng–Ping Chen. The network helps show where Cheng–Ping Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Cheng–Ping Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng–Ping Chen Line = papers co-authored together Cheng–Ping Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987406
2 1987196
3 200188
4 198781
5 199176
6 200874
7 199466
8 199062
9 199258
10 199156
11 198744
12 199036
13 201533
14 199628
15 199520
16 199117
17 20126
18 20123
19 20132
20 19861

About Cheng–Ping Chen

Cheng–Ping Chen is a scholar working on Ecology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Parasitology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Information Systems and Management, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physiological and biochemical adaptations (16 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (1 paper), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (1 paper), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (1 paper) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (1k citations), Insect Science (125 citations), Parasitology (29 citations), Aging (7 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (34 citations). Cheng–Ping Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David L. Denlinger, Richard E. Lee Jr., Virginia K. Walker, Lee–Yun Pan, Lei‐Yu Wu, Karl H. Joplin, Deborah C. Jaworski, Glen R. Needham, Ju-Ling Shih and Bernard P. Duncker. Their work appears in journals such as Cryobiology, Journal of Insect Physiology, Journal of Comparative Physiology B, Science and Physiological Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact