Chee How Teo

2.2k citations
70 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

    • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
    • Plant Virus Research Studies
    • Banana Cultivation and Research
  • Horticulture top 10%

Papers in

    • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 17
    • Banana Cultivation and Research 13
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research 9
    • Plant Virus Research Studies 7
    • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 6
    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 6
    • Plant tissue culture and regeneration 14

Chee How Teo

64 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Chee How Teo
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Plant Science 927
  • Horticulture 21
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 279
  • Food Science 255
  • Endocrinology 59
Replace Li Luo with:
Li Luo China
Mathews L. Paret United States
Pierre Van Cutsem Belgium
Ashok Chaudhury India
Xili Liu China
Zhenyu Zhang China
Mark H. Harpster United States
Abdul Qayyum Rao Pakistan
László Manczinger Hungary
Xiaohua Qi China
Chee How Teo relative to Li Luo China Li Luo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Li Luo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chee How Teo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chee How Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chee How Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chee How Teo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chee How Teo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chee How Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chee How Teo. The network helps show where Chee How Teo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chee How Teo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chee How Teo Line = papers co-authored together Chee How Teo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007311
2 1991160
3 2000128
4 200587
5 200779
6 201568
7 199262
8 200559
9 201358
10 201953
11 199651
12 201147
13 202246
14 201144
15 199342
16 200839
17 202038
18 201930
19 202030
20 200729

About Chee How Teo

Chee How Teo is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Genetics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (17 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (14 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (13 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (9 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (7 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (6 papers), Food composition and properties (6 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (927 citations), Horticulture (21 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (279 citations), Food Science (255 citations) and Endocrinology (59 citations). Chee How Teo has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include C. C. Seow, Trude Schwarzacher, Rofina Yasmin Othman, J. S. Heslop‐Harrison, V.B.C. Tan, Chorng Haur Sow, Binni Varghese, B. V. R. Chowdari, Andrew T. S. Wee and Chwee Teck Lim. Their work appears in journals such as Starch - Stärke, Plants, Chromosoma, Gene and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact