Charleton Coles
Impact in
-
- Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Pollution top 10%
- Heavy metals in environment
Papers in
- Surgery 1
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 1
- Hernia repair and management 1
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 1
- Co-authors
- Malcolm Williams (2 shared papers)Gabrielle Todd (2 shared papers)Nickolette Roney (2 shared papers)Jewell Crawford (2 shared papers)Kimberly Zaccaria (1 shared paper)Joan D Garey (1 shared paper)Peter R McClure (1 shared paper)Mario Citra (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Southern Medical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Charleton Coles
4 papers receiving 382 citations
Charleton Coles's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 243
- Pollution 120
- Nutrition and Dietetics 104
- Geochemistry and Petrology 28
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Charleton Coles
This map shows the geographic impact of Charleton Coles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charleton Coles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charleton Coles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charleton Coles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charleton Coles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charleton Coles. The network helps show where Charleton Coles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Charleton Coles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toxicological Profile for Manganese Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 360 |
| 2 | Draft toxicological profile for manganese | 2008 | 25 |
| 3 | Toxicological profile for plutonium | 2010 | 9 |
| 4 | 1978 | 1 |
About Charleton Coles
Charleton Coles is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Water Science and Technology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 4 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper), Analytical chemistry methods development (1 paper), Radioactive contamination and transfer (1 paper), Water Quality and Resources Studies (1 paper), Hernia repair and management (1 paper), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (1 paper) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (243 citations), Pollution (120 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (104 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (28 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (20 citations). Charleton Coles has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Williams, Gabrielle Todd, Nickolette Roney, Jewell Crawford, Kimberly Zaccaria, Joan D Garey, Peter R McClure, Mario Citra, Erik Auf der Heide and Robert Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Southern Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.