Charles Scafe
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Papers in
- Genetics 3
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 2
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 1
- Co-authors
- Mark A. Tanouye (1 shared paper)Daria S. Hekmat‐Scafe (1 shared paper)Aimee McKinney (1 shared paper)Dumitru Brinza (3 shared papers)Milan Radovich (2 shared papers)Jeffrey P. Solzak (2 shared papers)Kathy D. Miller (2 shared papers)Bradley A. Hancock (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Research (2 papers)npj Breast Cancer (1 paper)Human Heredity (1 paper)Genome Research (1 paper)Breast Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Charles Scafe
10 papers receiving 609 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 349
- Insect Science 237
- Genetics 222
- Cancer Research 106
- Sensory Systems 25
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Scafe
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Scafe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Scafe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Scafe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Scafe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Scafe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Scafe. The network helps show where Charles Scafe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Scafe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 384 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 1 |
About Charles Scafe
Charles Scafe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 10 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), Insect Utilization and Effects (1 paper), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (1 paper), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (349 citations), Insect Science (237 citations), Genetics (222 citations), Cancer Research (106 citations) and Sensory Systems (25 citations). Charles Scafe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Tanouye, Daria S. Hekmat‐Scafe, Aimee McKinney, Dumitru Brinza, Milan Radovich, Jeffrey P. Solzak, Kathy D. Miller, Bradley A. Hancock, Francisco M. De La Vega and Maki Moritani. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, npj Breast Cancer, Human Heredity, Genome Research and Breast Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.