Charles R. Wright

55 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Charles R. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Communication 462
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 131
  • Theoretical Computer Science 51
  • Gender Studies 191
  • Sociology and Political Science 868
Replace Howard Garland with:
Howard Garland United States
Andrew Robinson United Kingdom
Don Fallis United States
David A. Kravitz United States
Robert L. Tang Australia
John Lawrence United Kingdom
Douglas Walton Canada
Theodore Eisenberg United States
Maya Bar‐Hillel Israel
James J. Zhang United States
Charles R. Wright relative to Howard Garland United States Howard Garland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Howard Garland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles R. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles R. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles R. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles R. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles R. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles R. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles R. Wright. The network helps show where Charles R. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles R. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles R. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Charles R. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980188
2 1986188
3 1976177
4 1977163
5 1960157
6 1974152
7 2001149
8 1958146
9 1976119
10 1971111
11 197999
12 196053
13 196153
14 200049
15 197337
16 196836
17 196036
18 196229
19
Functional Analysis and Mass Communication Revisited
197423
20 199022

About Charles R. Wright

Charles R. Wright is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Finite Group Theory Research (18 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (10 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (8 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (462 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (131 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (51 citations), Gender Studies (191 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (868 citations). Charles R. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herbert H. Hyman, Sandra J. Ball‐Rokeach, Thelma McCormack, John Shelton Reed, Alan E. Bayer, Joseph R. Gusfield, Alexander W. Astin, Michael R. Manning, George Glauberman and Brad Gilbreath. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Social Forces, Journal of Algebra and Pacific Journal of Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact