Charles Lim

56 papers receiving 698 citations

Peers

Charles Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Signal Processing 358
  • Computer Networks and Communications 372
  • Information Systems 298
  • Software 53
  • Transportation 44
Replace Mark Shtern with:
Mark Shtern Canada
Jim Laredo United States
Shamal Faily United Kingdom
Nur Haryani Zakaria Malaysia
Madhu Prabaker United States
James A. Malcolm United Kingdom
Khabib Mustofa Indonesia
Ahmad Baraani-Dastjerdi Iran
Thomas Maillart Switzerland
Daniel Krause Germany
Charles Lim relative to Mark Shtern Canada Mark Shtern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Mark Shtern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Lim. The network helps show where Charles Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Lim Line = papers co-authored together Charles Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010247
2 2008100
3 201350
4
Minecraft: A Game as an Education and Scientific Learning Tool
201337
5 201129
6 200829
7 201029
8 201626
9 201722
10 202217
11 202115
12 202011
13 201911
14 202210
15 20229
16 20149
17 20148
18 20227
19 20236
20 20156

About Charles Lim

Charles Lim is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 67 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Network Security and Intrusion Detection (34 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (31 papers), Information and Cyber Security (9 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (8 papers), Smart Grid Security and Resilience (6 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (5 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (5 papers) and Network Packet Processing and Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (358 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (372 citations), Information Systems (298 citations), Software (53 citations) and Transportation (44 citations). Charles Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Indonesia, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anto Satriyo Nugroho, Alva Erwin, Chris Cooper, Lawrence J. Bendle, Ian Patterson, Benfano Soewito, Kalamullah Ramli, Maulahikmah Galinium, Gong Zhang and Chao Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Population Health Management, Nature Reviews Physics, Journal of Sport & Tourism and Digital Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact