Charles J. Wright

25 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

Charles J. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Biotechnology 141
  • Endocrinology 54
  • Food Science 126
  • Infectious Diseases 93
  • Plant Science 197
Replace A. Mark Walker with:
A. Mark Walker United States
J. Douglas Sleigh United Kingdom
Junglim Lee South Korea
Anna M. Fabiszewski de Aceituno United States
Matthew E. Wise United States
Cebisa Noxolo Nesamvuni South Africa
Ethel V. Taylor United States
Julie Lynn Self United States
Patricia Schirmer United States
Daniel A. del Portal United States
Charles J. Wright relative to A. Mark Walker United States A. Mark Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.6×
A. Mark Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles J. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles J. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles J. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles J. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles J. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles J. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles J. Wright. The network helps show where Charles J. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles J. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles J. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Charles J. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007126
2 2003102
3 201090
4 200374
5 197659
6 200551
7 200246
8 200944
9
Evaluation of indications for and outcomes of elective surgery.
200243
10 201241
11 197229
12 199224
13 200018
14 200918
15 200116
16 200511
17 20169
18 19796
19 20186
20 19754

About Charles J. Wright

Charles J. Wright is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Emergency Medical Services and Food Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (4 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (3 papers), Light effects on plants (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (2 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (141 citations), Endocrinology (54 citations), Food Science (126 citations), Infectious Diseases (93 citations) and Plant Science (197 citations). Charles J. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xianmin Chang, Peter G. Alderson, Keith Warriner, Matthew J. Dickinson, William M. Waites, Robert B. Yee, Spyros D. Kominos, G. Keith Chambers, James H. Willig and Michael J. Mugavero. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Journal of Critical Care, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Clinical Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact