Charles Hamm
Impact in
Papers in
- Music 21
- Music History and Culture 13
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 9
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 8
- Diverse Musicological Studies 4
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Doris Evans McGinty (1 shared paper)Charles Keil (1 shared paper)Bruno Nettl (2 shared papers)D. W. Krummel (1 shared paper)George Lipsitz (1 shared paper)John F. Garst (1 shared paper)Robert Louis Stevenson (1 shared paper)Gilbert Chase (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Notes (6 papers)Popular Music (6 papers)Journal of the American Musicological Society (6 papers)American Music (5 papers)Music and Letters (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Charles Hamm
33 papers receiving 147 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Music 249
- Classics 40
- Archeology 4
- History 32
- Religious studies 12
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Hamm
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Hamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Hamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Hamm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Hamm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Hamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Hamm. The network helps show where Charles Hamm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Charles Hamm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 70 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 37 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1965 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1962 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1980 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1960 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 14 | Contemporary music and music cultures | 1975 | 7 |
| 15 | 1965 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1960 | 4 |
About Charles Hamm
Charles Hamm is a scholar working on Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Literature and Literary Theory, Economics and Econometrics and History, having authored 44 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music History and Culture (13 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (9 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (8 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (4 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (249 citations), Classics (40 citations), Archeology (4 citations), History (32 citations) and Religious studies (12 citations). Charles Hamm has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Doris Evans McGinty, Charles Keil, Bruno Nettl, D. W. Krummel, George Lipsitz, John F. Garst, Robert Louis Stevenson, Gilbert Chase, John Kirkpatrick and Richard F. W. Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Notes, Popular Music, Journal of the American Musicological Society, American Music and Music and Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.