Charles E. Weaver

58 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Charles E. Weaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 324
  • Biomaterials 686
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 127
  • Geophysics 507
  • Paleontology 199
Replace Philip C. Bennett with:
Philip C. Bennett United States
William J. Meyers United States
William W. Barker United States
H. Kodama Japan
Magnus Ivarsson Sweden
Wilhelm van Bronswijk Australia
Andreas Reimer Germany
Julie LaRoche Canada
Jan Kučera Czechia
Kevin L. Brown United States
Charles E. Weaver relative to Philip C. Bennett United States Philip C. Bennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Philip C. Bennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Weaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Weaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Weaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Weaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Weaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Weaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Weaver. The network helps show where Charles E. Weaver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Weaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Weaver Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Weaver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997242
2 1960139
3 1977139
4 1955114
5 1997100
6 1967100
7 195299
8
The Effects and geologic significance of potassium “fixation” by expandable clay minerals derived from muscovite, biotite, chlorite, and volcanic material
195893
9 200086
10 196771
11 195366
12 197665
13 199065
14 195764
15 199563
16 200456
17 195851
18 196949
19 199848
20 195640

About Charles E. Weaver

Charles E. Weaver is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Artificial Intelligence, Mechanics of Materials, Geophysics and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clay minerals and soil interactions (21 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (14 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (9 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (8 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (6 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (324 citations), Biomaterials (686 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (127 citations), Geophysics (507 citations) and Paleontology (199 citations). Charles E. Weaver has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David H. Farb, Terrell T. Gibbs, Kevin C. Beck, J. M. Wampler, Robert L. Folk, Michael J. Baum, S. William Tam, Przemysław Marek, Mary S. Erskine and W. F. Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as AAPG Bulletin, Journal of Sedimentary Research, Clays and Clay Minerals, Sedimentary Geology and Geological Society of America Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact