Countries where authors publish in Sedimentary Geology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sedimentary Geology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sedimentary Geology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sedimentary Geology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sedimentary Geology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sedimentary Geology.
About Sedimentary Geology
The 5.9k papers published in Sedimentary Geology in the last decades have received a total of 245.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Sedimentary Geology usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (3.4k papers), Paleontology (1.7k papers), Atmospheric Science (3.3k papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (795 papers) and Geophysics (1.8k papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3.3k papers), Geological formations and processes (3.2k papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (1.7k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (937 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (699 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (657 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (616 papers) and Geological and Geophysical Studies (439 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sedimentary Geology are J.R.L. Allen, Andrew D. Miall, V. Paul Wright, Luc Harnois, Hans G. Machel, Keith A.W. Crook, J. R. L. Allen, James M. Coleman, George Postma and Eduardo Garzanti.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.