Charles E. Flower

1.4k citations
32 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Charles E. Flower

31 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Charles E. Flower
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Insect Science 321
  • Global and Planetary Change 556
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 260
  • Ecology 481
  • Soil Science 177
Replace Volkmar Timmermann with:
Volkmar Timmermann Norway
Jodi A. Forrester United States
Benjamin O. Knapp United States
Randy G. Jensen United States
Joanne Rebbeck United States
Zhaofei Fan United States
Luc Croisé France
Walter G. Thies United States
Khosro Sagheb‐Talebi Iran
Kazuhiko Hoshizaki Japan
Charles E. Flower relative to Volkmar Timmermann Norway Volkmar Timmermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Volkmar Timmermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles E. Flower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles E. Flower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles E. Flower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles E. Flower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles E. Flower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles E. Flower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles E. Flower. The network helps show where Charles E. Flower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles E. Flower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles E. Flower Line = papers co-authored together Charles E. Flower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013204
2 2012133
3 2007121
4 2015115
5 200980
6 201357
7 202153
8 201351
9 200940
10 201029
11 201727
12 201826
13 201723
14 201518
15 202017
16 202313
17 201812
18 201812
19 20177
20 20197

About Charles E. Flower

Charles E. Flower is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Ecology and Endocrinology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (14 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (10 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (6 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (321 citations), Global and Planetary Change (556 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (260 citations), Ecology (481 citations) and Soil Science (177 citations). Charles E. Flower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Miquel A. Gonzàlez‐Meler, Kathleen S. Knight, Peter S. Curtis, Christopher Michael Gough, Christoph S. Vogel, Douglas J. Lynch, Francesca M. Hopkins, Jianwu Tang, CLAUDIA I. CZIMCZIK and Jens‐Arne Subke. Their work appears in journals such as Forests, Forest Ecology and Management, Urban forestry & urban greening, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment and Plant Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact