Chaochen Tang

740 citations
41 papers · 532 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Chaochen Tang

36 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Chaochen Tang
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Horticulture 22
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 180
  • Food Science 100
  • Analytical Chemistry 47
  • Biochemistry 29
Replace Dragan Žnidarčić with:
Dragan Žnidarčić Slovenia
Michael Adesokan Nigeria
Susana Fischer Chile
Eroarome Martin Aregheore Fiji
Augusto Ramalho de Morais Brazil
Sreekumar Janardanan Nair India
Bolanle Omolara Otegbayo Nigeria
I. Alsiņa Latvia
Erik Nordkvist Sweden
David C Mugford France
Chaochen Tang relative to Dragan Žnidarčić Slovenia Dragan Žnidarčić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Dragan Žnidarčić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chaochen Tang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chaochen Tang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chaochen Tang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chaochen Tang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chaochen Tang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chaochen Tang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chaochen Tang. The network helps show where Chaochen Tang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chaochen Tang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chaochen Tang Line = papers co-authored together Chaochen Tang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201746
2 202137
3 201834
4 201933
5 201629
6 202028
7 202225
8 201823
9 202223
10 202121
11 201920
12 202220
13 202319
14 202314
15 202414
16 201713
17 201813
18 201712
19 201812
20 202212

About Chaochen Tang

Chaochen Tang is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Analytical Chemistry, Food Science, Horticulture and Biochemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioenergy crop production and management (12 papers), Food and Agricultural Sciences (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (8 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (4 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (4 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (3 papers) and Plant Gene Expression Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (22 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (180 citations), Food Science (100 citations), Analytical Chemistry (47 citations) and Biochemistry (29 citations). Chaochen Tang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Pakistan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Huimin Xie, Asif Ameen, Zhangying Wang, Xiaolin Yang, Meng Ya Li, Lipu Han, Rong Zhang, Xu Chen, Feng Chen and Wei Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry X, Agronomy, Frontiers in Plant Science, Industrial Crops and Products and Field Crops Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact