Ch. Jooss

2k citations
64 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Ch. Jooss

64 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Ch. Jooss
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Condensed Matter Physics 894
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 292
  • Biomedical Engineering 479
  • Structural Biology 13
  • Materials Chemistry 191
Replace David F. Storm with:
David F. Storm United States
J. Albrecht Germany
Sabine Freisem United States
Victor Rouco Spain
David J. Meyer United States
L. Maritato Italy
T. R. Dinger United States
Minoru Suzuki Japan
Brian P. Downey United States
Toshihisa Asano Japan
Ch. Jooss relative to David F. Storm United States David F. Storm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
David F. Storm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ch. Jooss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ch. Jooss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ch. Jooss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ch. Jooss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ch. Jooss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ch. Jooss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ch. Jooss. The network helps show where Ch. Jooss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ch. Jooss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ch. Jooss Line = papers co-authored together Ch. Jooss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002387
2 2007146
3 1997137
4 1998104
5 200777
6 200062
7 199955
8 200453
9 199652
10 200849
11 200732
12 200430
13 199629
14 200128
15 200228
16 200827
17 201427
18 201224
19 199822
20 200120

About Ch. Jooss

Ch. Jooss is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Structural Biology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (38 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (15 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (8 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (3 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (2 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (2 papers) and Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (894 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (292 citations), Biomedical Engineering (479 citations), Structural Biology (13 citations) and Materials Chemistry (191 citations). Ch. Jooss has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Kronmüller, J. Albrecht, H. Kühn, Alexander Forkl, Yimei Zhu, Jörg Hoffmann, Robert F. Klie, H.‐U. Habermeier, Herbert C. Freyhardt and Jörg Zegenhagen. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Physical Review B, Superconductor Science and Technology, Journal of Applied Physics and Ultramicroscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact