Alexander Forkl

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Alexander Forkl
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Condensed Matter Physics 952
  • Biomedical Engineering 376
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 148
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 62
  • Materials Chemistry 77
Replace J.M. Huijbregtse with:
J.M. Huijbregtse Netherlands
Heinz Küpfer Germany
N. Chikumoto Japan
Lev Dorosinskii Türkiye
H. R. Kerchner United States
Stanislaw J. Lewandowski Poland
André Catana Switzerland
Kazunuki Yamamoto Japan
Félix Vidal Spain
T. Machi Japan
Alexander Forkl relative to J.M. Huijbregtse Netherlands J.M. Huijbregtse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
J.M. Huijbregtse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Forkl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Forkl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Forkl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Forkl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Forkl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Forkl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Forkl. The network helps show where Alexander Forkl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Forkl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Forkl Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Forkl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993271
2 1997137
3 1992105
4 1998104
5 199577
6 199357
7 199652
8 199343
9 199438
10 199037
11 199133
12 199629
13 199729
14 199526
15 199324
16 199822
17 199420
18 199118
19 199418
20 199216

About Alexander Forkl

Alexander Forkl is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (28 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (7 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (2 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper) and Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (952 citations), Biomedical Engineering (376 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (148 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (62 citations) and Materials Chemistry (77 citations). Alexander Forkl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Helmut Kronmüller, Mikhail V. Indenbom, Ernst Helmut Brandt, H.‐U. Habermeier, Ch. Jooss, Horst Theuss, Bernd Leibold, T. Haage, Jörg Zegenhagen and Manuel Cardona. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, physica status solidi (a), Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Alloys and Compounds.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact