Cemil Ceylan

437 citations
9 papers · 285 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Cemil Ceylan

9 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Cemil Ceylan
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Strategy and Management 143
  • Business and International Management 14
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 38
  • Marketing 49
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 40
Replace Stephanie Christine Schleimer with:
Stephanie Christine Schleimer Australia
Adrian J. Slywotzky United States
Anna Roberts United States
Harold L. Sirkin
Chen‐Wei Yang Taiwan
Nataliya Podgorodnichenko New Zealand
Mariana Nicolae United States
Samuel Mafabi Uganda
Hadi Balouei Jamkhaneh Iran
Ramunė Čiarnienė Lithuania
Cemil Ceylan relative to Stephanie Christine Schleimer Australia Stephanie Christine Schleimer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stephanie Christine Schleimer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cemil Ceylan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cemil Ceylan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cemil Ceylan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cemil Ceylan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cemil Ceylan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cemil Ceylan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cemil Ceylan. The network helps show where Cemil Ceylan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Cemil Ceylan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cemil Ceylan Line = papers co-authored together Cemil Ceylan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown

About Cemil Ceylan

Cemil Ceylan is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 9 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (1 paper), Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies (1 paper) and Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (143 citations), Business and International Management (14 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (38 citations), Marketing (49 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (40 citations). Cemil Ceylan has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Tufan Koç, Yiğit Kazançoğlu, G. Nilay Yücenur and Tufan Demirel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Economics and Management, Technovation, International Journal of Healthcare Management, Yugoslav journal of operations research and Data Technologies and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact