Céline Davy

763 citations
10 papers · 570 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Céline Davy

10 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Céline Davy
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Reproductive Medicine 238
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 201
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 253
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 129
  • Genetics 76
Replace Jehoshua Dor with:
Jehoshua Dor Israel
Vidar von Dûring Norway
Sue Breheny Australia
Thanos Paraschos United Kingdom
Bala Bhagavath United States
Katarzyna Litwicka Italy
L.C. Demirel Türkiye
Theodore A. Baramki United States
Marcos Sampaio Brazil
Jiann‐Loung Hwang Taiwan
Céline Davy relative to Jehoshua Dor Israel Jehoshua Dor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Jehoshua Dor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Céline Davy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Céline Davy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline Davy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline Davy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Céline Davy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline Davy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline Davy. The network helps show where Céline Davy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Céline Davy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Céline Davy Line = papers co-authored together Céline Davy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2004212
2 2008149
3 200651
4 200850
5 200843
6 200936
7 200913
8 202210
9 20073
10 20083

About Céline Davy

Céline Davy is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (238 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (201 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (253 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (129 citations) and Genetics (76 citations). Céline Davy has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carole L. Thomas, François Goffinet, D. Cabrol, Denis Clément, Gilles Kayem, ChopinNicolas, Bruno Borghese, H. Foulot, Charles Chapron and Patricia Fauque. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Biomolecules and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact