Celia E. Coto

85 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Celia E. Coto
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Infectious Diseases 561
  • Virology 66
  • Pharmacology 120
  • Aquatic Science 80
  • Food Science 199
Replace Márcia Dalastra Laurenti with:
Márcia Dalastra Laurenti Brazil
Shimaa Abd El‒Salam El‒Sayed Egypt
Juliano Bordignon Brazil
Jia‐Tsrong Jan Taiwan
Gabriel J. Mitchell United States
Viviana Castilla Argentina
Simona Nardoni Italy
Tadafumi S. Tochikura Japan
Ryan J. Arsenault United States
Luis A. Scolaro Argentina
Celia E. Coto relative to Márcia Dalastra Laurenti Brazil Márcia Dalastra Laurenti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Márcia Dalastra Laurenti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia E. Coto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia E. Coto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia E. Coto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia E. Coto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia E. Coto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia E. Coto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia E. Coto. The network helps show where Celia E. Coto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia E. Coto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia E. Coto Line = papers co-authored together Celia E. Coto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003136
2 1987100
3 200083
4 199478
5 199970
6 200259
7 200356
8 200252
9 198247
10 199145
11 197544
12 200241
13 196638
14 200937
15 198334
16 199830
17 198928
18 199827
19 200727
20 198025

About Celia E. Coto

Celia E. Coto is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Virology, Immunology, Epidemiology and Plant Science, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (21 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (18 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (17 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (15 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (12 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (11 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (10 papers) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (561 citations), Virology (66 citations), Pharmacology (120 citations), Aquatic Science (80 citations) and Food Science (199 citations). Celia E. Coto has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Elsa Beatriz Damonte, Mónica B. Wachsman, Mercedes C. Weissenbacher, Viviana Castilla, Ramón Alberto de Torres, Laura Edith Alché, Javier Alberto Ramirez, Ruben Pedro Laguens, Aida Pesce De Ruiz Holgado and Fernando J. M. Sesma. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Virology, Phytotherapy Research, Journal of Medical Virology, Antiviral chemistry & chemotherapy and International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact