Celeste M. Condit

5.7k citations
133 papers · 4.0k · h-index 35

Impact in

  • Communication top 0.5%
    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Philosophy top 0.1%
    • Rhetoric and Communication Studies

Papers in

Celeste M. Condit

127 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Celeste M. Condit
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Communication 705
  • Philosophy 1.1k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 721
  • Genetics 913
  • Gender Studies 294
Replace Andrew Smith with:
Andrew Smith United States
Douglas W. Maynard United States
Kwame Anthony Appiah United States
Elizabeth Grosz United States
Deborah Cameron United Kingdom
Léon S. Roudiez United States
Onora O’Neill United Kingdom
Bruno Bettelheim United States
Susan Bordo United States
Jessica Jacobson United States
Celeste M. Condit relative to Andrew Smith United States Andrew Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.0×
Andrew Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celeste M. Condit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celeste M. Condit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celeste M. Condit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celeste M. Condit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celeste M. Condit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celeste M. Condit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celeste M. Condit. The network helps show where Celeste M. Condit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celeste M. Condit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celeste M. Condit Line = papers co-authored together Celeste M. Condit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 133 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989269
2 1991163
3 2008147
4 2004124
5 1993115
6 2010114
7 1994107
8 2009106
9 1994104
10 201298
11 199997
12 199894
13 198593
14 198589
15 200380
16 200176
17 200775
18 201073
19 200371
20 200464

About Celeste M. Condit

Celeste M. Condit is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Genetics, having authored 133 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (48 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (32 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (24 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (16 papers), Media Studies and Communication (15 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (11 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (11 papers) and Genetically Modified Organisms Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (705 citations), Philosophy (1.1k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (721 citations), Genetics (913 citations) and Gender Studies (294 citations). Celeste M. Condit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Louis Lucaites, Roxanne Parrott, Tina M. Harris, John Lynch, Cecilia Benoit, Lijiang Shen, Benjamin R. Bates, Jennifer L. Bevan, Kami J. Silk and Paul Achter. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, Public Understanding of Science, Public Health Genomics, Genetics in Medicine and Women s Studies in Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact