Cedric Schelling

549 citations
29 papers · 489 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Cedric Schelling

28 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

Cedric Schelling
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Analytical Chemistry 76
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 196
  • Structural Biology 9
  • Toxicology 17
  • Condensed Matter Physics 54
Replace Kunio Nakajima with:
Kunio Nakajima Japan
Bing Liang China
Jeffrey D. Maas United States
Cristian Enrique Morales Rojas Ecuador
Sebastiano Vasi Italy
M.R. Taylor United Kingdom
Zhiquan Yuan United States
Hao Jin China
Robert W. Ryan United States
Javad Vahedi Iran
Cedric Schelling relative to Kunio Nakajima Japan Kunio Nakajima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kunio Nakajima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cedric Schelling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cedric Schelling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cedric Schelling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cedric Schelling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cedric Schelling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cedric Schelling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cedric Schelling. The network helps show where Cedric Schelling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cedric Schelling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cedric Schelling Line = papers co-authored together Cedric Schelling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199982
2 200271
3 200350
4 202139
5 201837
6 200032
7 200131
8 200822
9 195122
10 200220
11 202014
12 202210
13 20009
14 20036
15 20025
16 20225
17 20054
18 20234
19 20254
20 20004

About Cedric Schelling

Cedric Schelling is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Analytical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Pharmacology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (8 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (5 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (76 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (196 citations), Structural Biology (9 citations), Toxicology (17 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (54 citations). Cedric Schelling has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Friedrich Schaffler, Gunther Springholz, Jean‐Luc Veuthey, Serge L. Rudaz, Michael M. Mühlberger, Josef Mysliveček, Bert Voigtländer, Pavel Šmilauer, Davy Guillarme and Joachim Krug. Their work appears in journals such as Thin Solid Films, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Journal of Chromatography A, Materials Science and Engineering B and Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact