Cédric Neumann

51 papers receiving 873 citations

Peers

Cédric Neumann
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Safety Research 259
  • Signal Processing 222
  • Archeology 172
  • Genetics 362
  • Conservation 35
Replace David A. Stoney with:
David A. Stoney United States
JoAnn Buscaglia United States
Marjan Sjerps Netherlands
R. Cook United Kingdom
Didier Meuwly Netherlands
Anders Nordgaard Sweden
Silvia Bozza Switzerland
Tacha Hicks Switzerland
Williams Mazzella Switzerland
C.M. Triggs New Zealand
Cédric Neumann relative to David A. Stoney United States David A. Stoney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
David A. Stoney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cédric Neumann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cédric Neumann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cédric Neumann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cédric Neumann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cédric Neumann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cédric Neumann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cédric Neumann. The network helps show where Cédric Neumann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cédric Neumann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cédric Neumann Line = papers co-authored together Cédric Neumann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012104
2 2006102
3 200661
4 200760
5 201056
6 200953
7 202151
8 202030
9 202026
10 200926
11
Improving the Understanding and the Reliability of the Concept of "Sufficiency" in Friction Ridge Examination
201425
12 201521
13 201520
14 201120
15 201619
16 200919
17 201019
18 202017
19
Level 3 details and their role in fingerprint identification: A survey among practitioners
200815
20 200815

About Cédric Neumann

Cédric Neumann is a scholar working on Genetics, Safety Research, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 59 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (23 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (16 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (10 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (8 papers), Digital Media Forensic Detection (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (3 papers) and Conservation Techniques and Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (259 citations), Signal Processing (222 citations), Archeology (172 citations), Genetics (362 citations) and Conservation (35 citations). Cédric Neumann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Margot, I.W. Evett, Christophe Champod, Nicole Egli, Roberto Puch‐Solis, Christopher P. Saunders, Robert Ramotowski, James M. Curran, Peter Gill and Didier Meuwly. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Chemistry, Science & Justice and Law Probability and Risk.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact