Cecilia Testa

778 citations
32 papers · 434 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Cecilia Testa

28 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Cecilia Testa
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Political Science and International Relations 267
  • Economics and Econometrics 264
  • Development 15
  • Strategy and Management 44
  • Public Administration 10
Replace Laura Seelkopf with:
Laura Seelkopf Germany
Vuk Vuković United Kingdom
Paulette Kurzer United States
Gerald M. Easter United States
Thomas Mustillo United States
Michael Lusztig United States
Vicki L. Birchfield United States
Jean‐Dominique Lafay France
Lucy Martin United States
Catriona Purfield United States
Cecilia Testa relative to Laura Seelkopf Germany Laura Seelkopf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Laura Seelkopf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cecilia Testa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilia Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilia Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilia Testa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilia Testa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilia Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilia Testa. The network helps show where Cecilia Testa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Cecilia Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cecilia Testa Line = papers co-authored together Cecilia Testa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006188
2
Testing Models of Distributive Politics using Exit Polls to Measure Voters ’ Preferences and Partisanship
200946
3 201820
4 200920
5 200520
6 201220
7 200918
8 200911
9 201310
10 20109
11 20078
12 20147
13 20107
14 20156
15 20086
16 20096
17 20235
18 20133
19 20053
20 20053

About Cecilia Testa

Cecilia Testa is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Molecular Biology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (14 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (10 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (10 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (10 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (6 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (5 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (4 papers) and Politics, Economics, and Education Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (267 citations), Economics and Econometrics (264 citations), Development (15 citations), Strategy and Management (44 citations) and Public Administration (10 citations). Cecilia Testa has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Facchini, James M. Snyder, Valentino Larcinese, Leonzio Rizzo, Lorenzo Corsi, Raffaella Cocco, Alessandro Di Cerbo, Sergio Canello, Gianandrea Guidetti and Maria Nieddu. Their work appears in journals such as European Economic Review, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, CESifo Economic Studies, Public Choice and Journal of Political Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact