Cécile Monod

632 citations
16 papers · 208 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Cécile Monod

14 papers receiving 201 citations

Peers

Cécile Monod
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 137
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 46
  • Emergency Medicine 15
  • Physiology 24
Replace Hala Abdullahi with:
Hala Abdullahi Qatar
Panos Maouris Australia
Nadeem Zuberi Pakistan
Marc-Yvon Arsenault Canada
Ingela Hulthén Varli Sweden
Alissa Carver United States
Vlad Tica Romania
Selcan Sınacı Türkiye
Jorge Arturo Cardona–Pérez Mexico
Brian Wagner United States
Cécile Monod relative to Hala Abdullahi Qatar Hala Abdullahi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Hala Abdullahi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cécile Monod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cécile Monod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cécile Monod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cécile Monod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cécile Monod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cécile Monod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cécile Monod. The network helps show where Cécile Monod may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cécile Monod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cécile Monod Line = papers co-authored together Cécile Monod links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 202094
2 201343
3 202219
4 202214
5 20219
6 20237
7 20226
8 20225
9 20195
10 20242
11 20221
12 20221
13 20251
14 20231
15 20250
16 20250

About Cécile Monod

Cécile Monod is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Infectious Diseases, Physiology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (8 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (2 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (137 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (46 citations), Emergency Medicine (15 citations) and Physiology (24 citations). Cécile Monod has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Austria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Irène Hösli, Irène Hoesli, Stefan Gisin, Thomas Menter, Alexandar Tzankov, Sizun Jiang, Sven Schulzke, Kirsten D. Mertz, Han Chen and Elisabeth Bruder. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Frontiers in Physiology, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and Journal of Perinatal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact