Julius Emons

798 citations
50 papers · 292 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Julius Emons

42 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Julius Emons
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 83
  • Biophysics 15
  • Cancer Research 39
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 76
Replace Alexander Kagen with:
Alexander Kagen United States
Inki Lee South Korea
Lei Tang China
Anastasios Mangelis United Kingdom
Hyong Woo Moon South Korea
Lee G. Wilke United States
Piotr Szumowski Poland
Dragana Savic United Kingdom
Alison Griffiths Australia
Julius Emons relative to Alexander Kagen United States Alexander Kagen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Alexander Kagen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Emons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Emons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Emons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Emons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Emons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Emons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Emons. The network helps show where Julius Emons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julius Emons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Emons Line = papers co-authored together Julius Emons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201444
2
THE EFFECT OF ANTENATAL PHENOBARBITAL THERAPY ON NEONATAL INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE IN PRETERM INFANTS
199723
3 201816
4 202015
5 202111
6 202011
7 201611
8 201710
9 202110
10 202010
11 20129
12 20219
13 20239
14 20249
15 20209
16 20208
17 20188
18 20237
19 20176
20 20246

About Julius Emons

Julius Emons is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, Oncology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 50 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (11 papers), AI in cancer detection (9 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (5 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (5 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (12 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (83 citations), Biophysics (15 citations), Cancer Research (39 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (76 citations). Julius Emons has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Fasching, Matthias W. Beckmann, Michael Uder, Arndt Hartmann, Evelyn Wenkel, Paul Gaß, Sebastian M. Jud, Ramona Erber, Felix Heindl and Rüdiger Schulz‐Wendtland. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Care, Scientific Reports, European Radiology and Medical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact