Julius Emons

46 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Julius Emons
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 61
  • Biophysics 16
  • Cancer Research 28
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 34
Replace Yanyan Tang with:
Yanyan Tang China
Alexander Kagen United States
Xiaosong Xu China
Eva Hassler Austria
Puneet Batra United States
Myung‐Chul Lee South Korea
Sara Sabatasso Switzerland
Lian Yi United States
Eleonora Lori Italy
Paola Tesorio Italy
Julius Emons relative to Yanyan Tang China Yanyan Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Yanyan Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Emons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Emons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Emons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Emons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Emons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Emons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Emons. The network helps show where Julius Emons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julius Emons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Emons Line = papers co-authored together Julius Emons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201447
2
THE EFFECT OF ANTENATAL PHENOBARBITAL THERAPY ON NEONATAL INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE IN PRETERM INFANTS
199730
3 201817
4 202016
5 202312
6 202112
7 202012
8 201211
9 201611
10 202011
11 202411
12 202110
13 202010
14 201710
15 202110
16 20239
17 20249
18 20209
19 20188
20 20187

About Julius Emons

Julius Emons is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Research and Health Informatics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (7 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (13 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (61 citations), Biophysics (16 citations), Cancer Research (28 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (34 citations). Julius Emons has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter A. Fasching, Matthias W. Beckmann, Michael Uder, Arndt Hartmann, Ramona Erber, Felix Heindl, Evelyn Wenkel, Paul Gaß, Rüdiger Schulz‐Wendtland and Sebastian M. Jud. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Care, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, European Radiology, Scientific Reports and Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact