C.E. Smith
Impact in
- Urology top 10%
- Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Pharmaceutical Science top 10%
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Sarah Hill (2 shared papers)Amanda Amos (2 shared papers)Duane F. Reinert (3 shared papers)Michael G. Luxenberg (3 shared papers)Alexander S. Cass (3 shared papers)Paul Gleich (3 shared papers)Melvin P. Bubrick (2 shared papers)P.S. Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Religion and Health (2 papers)Annals of Human Genetics (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Journal of Materials Chemistry (1 paper)Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomHungary
In The Last Decade
C.E. Smith
17 papers receiving 398 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Urology 32
- Pharmaceutical Science 34
- Health 41
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 46
- Ophthalmology 22
Countries citing papers authored by C.E. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of C.E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.E. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.E. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.E. Smith. The network helps show where C.E. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 85 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 19 | The Value of Partnerships in Multi-Component Skin Cancer Prevention Interventions. | 2022 | 0 |
About C.E. Smith
C.E. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Health, Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper) and Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (32 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (34 citations), Health (41 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (46 citations) and Ophthalmology (22 citations). C.E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Hill, Amanda Amos, Duane F. Reinert, Michael G. Luxenberg, Alexander S. Cass, Paul Gleich, Melvin P. Bubrick, P.S. Smith, Christopher Viney and Stewart J. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Religion and Health, Annals of Human Genetics, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Materials Chemistry and Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.