C.D. Bishop
Impact in
- Food Science top 5%
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
- Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Papers in
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 4
- Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases 3
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 2
- Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms 2
- Nematode management and characterization studies 2
-
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 7
- Co-authors
- Richard M. Cooper (3 shared papers)M. J. Pascual‐Villalobos (1 shared paper)G. Russell (2 shared papers)Jane Collins (1 shared paper)Katerina P. Svoboda (1 shared paper)Patricia E. Klein (1 shared paper)David Byrne (1 shared paper)H. Brent Pemberton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Applied Biology (2 papers)Phytochemistry (1 paper)Plant Pathology (1 paper)Journal of Essential Oil Research (4 papers)Acta Horticulturae (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHungaryNetherlands
In The Last Decade
C.D. Bishop
14 papers receiving 647 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Food Science 330
- Plant Science 581
- Cell Biology 251
- Biochemistry 50
- Horticulture 4
Countries citing papers authored by C.D. Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of C.D. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.D. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.D. Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.D. Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.D. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.D. Bishop. The network helps show where C.D. Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside C.D. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 195 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 114 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 112 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 84 | |
| 5 | 1983 | 70 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 33 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 31 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1975 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 1 |
About C.D. Bishop
C.D. Bishop is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology, Food Science, Complementary and alternative medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 717 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (4 papers), Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers), Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (2 papers), Morinda citrifolia extract uses (2 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (330 citations), Plant Science (581 citations), Cell Biology (251 citations), Biochemistry (50 citations) and Horticulture (4 citations). C.D. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Cooper, M. J. Pascual‐Villalobos, G. Russell, Jane Collins, Katerina P. Svoboda, Patricia E. Klein, David Byrne, H. Brent Pemberton and Kevin Ong. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Applied Biology, Phytochemistry, Plant Pathology, Journal of Essential Oil Research and Acta Horticulturae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.