Cathy Howe

706 citations
10 papers · 471 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Cathy Howe

10 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Cathy Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Health Informatics 12
  • General Health Professions 135
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 128
  • Health Information Management 12
Replace Gert P Westert with:
Gert P Westert Netherlands
Julie Cerese United States
Michael T. Huber United States
Meryem Yavuz Van Gıersbergen Türkiye
Nejm Catalyst
Peggy White Canada
Kathryn Pyle Krages United States
Justin Gore United Kingdom
Anne Dichmann Sorknæs Denmark
Jonathan D. Sonis United States
Cathy Howe relative to Gert P Westert Netherlands Gert P Westert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Gert P Westert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cathy Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathy Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathy Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathy Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathy Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathy Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathy Howe. The network helps show where Cathy Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Cathy Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cathy Howe Line = papers co-authored together Cathy Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2013145
2 2018112
3 2013109
4 201829
5 201824
6 201423
7 201317
8 20137
9 20144
10 20141

About Cathy Howe

Cathy Howe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper) and Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (12 citations), General Health Professions (135 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (128 citations) and Health Information Management (12 citations). Cathy Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Derek Bell, Cathal Doyle, Julie Reed, Stuart A. Green, Karen Phekoo, Chris McNicholas, Thomas Woodcock, Rowan Myron, Sarah E. Jones and William D‐C Man. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Quality in Health Care, BMC Medicine, Implementation Science, BMJ Open Respiratory Research and Thorax.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact