Catherine Wright

3.5k citations
67 papers · 2.9k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine Wright

65 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Catherine Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Reproductive Medicine 376
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 664
  • Rehabilitation 102
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 105
Replace Gere S. diZerega with:
Gere S. diZerega United States
Г. Т. Сухих Russia
Jie Tang China
Liping Jin China
Martti Kormano Finland
Dongsheng Zhang United States
George O. Gey United States
Ling Zeng China
Matthias M. Weber Germany
Fuminori Kimura Japan
Catherine Wright relative to Gere S. diZerega United States Gere S. diZerega's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Gere S. diZerega · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Wright. The network helps show where Catherine Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Wright Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999213
2 1999206
3 2013165
4 2008151
5 1980149
6 2000146
7 1992121
8 2001100
9 1972100
10 200995
11 200092
12 201089
13 200078
14 200072
15 200265
16 201456
17 197252
18 200249
19 199643
20 201141

About Catherine Wright

Catherine Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (10 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (5 papers), Heat shock proteins research (5 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (376 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (664 citations), Rehabilitation (102 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (105 citations). Catherine Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Kate Hardy, Patricia E. Martin, Outi Hovatta, Robert Winston, Judith Rankin, Svetlana V. Glinianaia, Stephen Franks, John O’Sullivan, Thomas Krausz and Malcolm B. Hodgins. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Human Reproduction, Journal of Molecular Biology and Prenatal Diagnosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact