Catherine M. Dower

13 papers receiving 232 citations

Peers

Catherine M. Dower
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • Emergency Medical Services 42
  • General Health Professions 148
  • Economics and Econometrics 61
Replace Maureen A. Kelley with:
Maureen A. Kelley United States
Marlène Karam Canada
Grainne Lowe Australia
Chris Podo Rakuom Kenya
Taghred Alghaith United States
Kevin Grumbach United States
Monica O’Reilly-Jacob United States
Dana Ryan Canada
Heather Strachan United Kingdom
Margaret Flinter United States
Catherine M. Dower relative to Maureen A. Kelley United States Maureen A. Kelley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Maureen A. Kelley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine M. Dower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine M. Dower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine M. Dower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine M. Dower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine M. Dower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine M. Dower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine M. Dower. The network helps show where Catherine M. Dower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Catherine M. Dower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine M. Dower Line = papers co-authored together Catherine M. Dower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201389
2 200444
3 200929
4
Primary care health workforce in the United States.
201122
5 199720
6 199919
7 201515
8 20189
9
Changing nature of physician licensure. Implications for medical education in California.
19984
10 20194
11
THE MENTAL HEALTH WORKFORCE
20032
12 19991
13 19971
14 20021
15 20030
16 20260

About Catherine M. Dower

Catherine M. Dower is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Emergency Medical Services, Pharmacy and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (1 paper), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper) and Healthcare Quality and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (8 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations), Emergency Medical Services (42 citations), General Health Professions (148 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (61 citations). Catherine M. Dower has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Margaret H. Langelier, Jean Moore, Susan A. Chapman, Edward J. O’Neil, Diana Taylor, Andrew B. Bindman, Kevin Grumbach, Edward H. O’Neil, Diane R. Rittenhouse and Joanne Spetz. Their work appears in journals such as Health Affairs, Journal of Healthcare Management, Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, Public Health Reports and Women s Health Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact