Catherine E. Smith

29 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Catherine E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Ecological Modeling 84
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 263
  • Genetics 401
  • Molecular Biology 988
  • Cancer Research 174
Replace Claus Steinlein with:
Claus Steinlein Germany
Britta Meyer Germany
Danielle Glossip United States
Marco Trizzino United States
Julianne Meyne United States
Kirsten J. Monsen United States
Maria Lúcia Harada Brazil
Hardip R. Patel Australia
Dmitri A. Kramerov Russia
Willem Rens United Kingdom
Catherine E. Smith relative to Claus Steinlein Germany Claus Steinlein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Claus Steinlein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. Smith. The network helps show where Catherine E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Catherine E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007274
2 2008240
3 2009234
4 2011164
5 201486
6 200974
7 201355
8 201351
9 200543
10 201529
11 200719
12
NEW BEHAVIORAL, ECOLOGICAL, AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC DATA ON THE AVIFAUNA OF RENNELL, SOLOMON ISLANDS
199914
13 200114
14 200813
15 200710
16 20009
17 20169
18 20179
19 19928
20 20017

About Catherine E. Smith

Catherine E. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Political Science and International Relations, Ecology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (6 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (4 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (84 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (263 citations), Genetics (401 citations), Molecular Biology (988 citations) and Cancer Research (174 citations). Catherine E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and France. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine S. Symington, Bertrand Llorente, Christopher E. Filardi, Richard D. Kolodner, Jared M. Diamond, Robert G. Moyle, Hans Hombauer, Christopher S. Campbell, Arshad Desai and Alicia Lam. Their work appears in journals such as The Auk, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Academic Radiology and Cell Cycle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact