Catherine E. Prado

442 citations
10 papers · 313 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine E. Prado

10 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Catherine E. Prado
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Biological Psychiatry 22
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 19
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 97
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 73
Replace Michael Weightman with:
Michael Weightman Australia
Lindsay W. Victoria United States
Caterina Galandra Italy
Marjolein Boshuisen Netherlands
G.N. Christodoulou Greece
Salma Rose Imanari Ribeiz Brazil
Catherine Hatfield United Kingdom
Jen-Ping Hwang Taiwan
Jung Seo Yi South Korea
E.T. Ozel-Kizil Türkiye
Catherine E. Prado relative to Michael Weightman Australia Michael Weightman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael Weightman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. Prado

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. Prado's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. Prado with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. Prado more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. Prado

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. Prado. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. Prado. The network helps show where Catherine E. Prado may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Catherine E. Prado, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine E. Prado Line = papers co-authored together Catherine E. Prado links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2018138
2 201934
3 201330
4 201527
5 201925
6 201521
7 201613
8 201911
9 20178
10 20176

About Catherine E. Prado

Catherine E. Prado is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (2 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (22 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (19 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (97 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (73 citations). Catherine E. Prado has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Simon F. Crowe, Matt S. Treeby, Simon Rice, Xiaoyan Xu, Christopher J.L. Wilson, Linda K. Byrne, Hong Liu, David Mellor, Raimondo Bruno and Michael Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychology Review, Motivation and Emotion, Substance Use & Misuse, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact