Catherine E. D. Rees

59 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Catherine E. D. Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Biotechnology 290
  • Ecology 915
  • Infectious Diseases 313
  • Food Science 305
  • Endocrinology 52
Replace A. Baumgärtner with:
A. Baumgärtner Switzerland
Pilar García Spain
Lorena Rodríguez‐Rubio Spain
Jørgen Johannes Leisner Denmark
Jochen Klumpp Switzerland
Raúl Ricardo Raya Argentina
Giorgia Borriello Italy
Raul Antonio Almeida United States
Diana Gutiérrez Spain
Morten Kjos Norway
Catherine E. D. Rees relative to A. Baumgärtner Switzerland A. Baumgärtner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.9×
A. Baumgärtner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. D. Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. D. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. D. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. D. Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. D. Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. D. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. D. Rees. The network helps show where Catherine E. D. Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine E. D. Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine E. D. Rees Line = papers co-authored together Catherine E. D. Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992218
2 2003200
3 2010196
4 1993185
5 1996180
6 2000155
7 2001154
8 2000131
9 2003120
10 200598
11 199582
12 200480
13 200770
14 200669
15 199067
16 201063
17 201561
18 200651
19 198948
20 200141

About Catherine E. D. Rees

Catherine E. D. Rees is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Ecology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology and Food Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (14 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (14 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (10 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (9 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (8 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (5 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (3 papers) and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (290 citations), Ecology (915 citations), Infectious Diseases (313 citations), Food Science (305 citations) and Endocrinology (52 citations). Catherine E. D. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Christine E. R. Dodd, Gordon S.A.B. Stewart, Phillippa L. Connerton, Ian F. Connerton, Brian M. Wilkins, Robert J. Atterbury, Philip J. Hill, Martin J. Loessner, Paul M. Williams and Benjamin M. C. Swift. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, International Journal of Food Microbiology, Molecular Microbiology, Scientific Reports and Journal of Bacteriology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact