Catherine Barsics

804 citations
16 papers · 578 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Catherine Barsics

16 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Catherine Barsics
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 229
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 241
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 15
  • Applied Psychology 43
  • Social Psychology 154
Replace Lily FitzGibbon with:
Lily FitzGibbon United Kingdom
Enrique Pérez Spain
Annika Smit Netherlands
Eleanor K. Hanna United States
Pilleriin Sikka Finland
Bryan D. Poole United States
Benjamin Buttlar Germany
Daniel Barratt Denmark
Erika Siegel United States
John Kentish United Kingdom
Catherine Barsics relative to Lily FitzGibbon United Kingdom Lily FitzGibbon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Lily FitzGibbon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Barsics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Barsics's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Barsics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Barsics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Barsics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Barsics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Barsics. The network helps show where Catherine Barsics may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Barsics, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Barsics Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Barsics links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2017104
2 201597
3 201754
4 201648
5 201647
6 201537
7 201434
8 200934
9 201030
10 201228
11 201614
12 201214
13 201712
14 201212
15 201710
16 20223

About Catherine Barsics

Catherine Barsics is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 16 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (4 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (3 papers) and Mind wandering and attention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (229 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (241 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (15 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations) and Social Psychology (154 citations). Catherine Barsics has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Martial Van der Linden, Serge Brédart, Arnaud D’Argembeau, Lucien Rochat, Marie My Lien Rebetez, Christophe Blecker, Frédéric Francis, Éric Haubruge, Yves Brostaux and Rudy Caparros Megido. Their work appears in journals such as Memory, Consciousness and Cognition, British Food Journal, Vision Research and European Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact