Catherine Ames
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Papers in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 7
- Genetics 6
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 6
- Co-authors
- Sue Fletcher‐Watson (1 shared paper)Sarah White (1 shared paper)Patrick Bolton (3 shared papers)Christopher Jarrold (2 shared papers)Eleanor Leigh (1 shared paper)Patrick Smith (1 shared paper)Susanna Payne (1 shared paper)Nicola Gillan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (3 papers)European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (3 papers)Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (2 papers)BMC Geriatrics (1 paper)Developmental Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Catherine Ames
12 papers receiving 486 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 340
- Psychiatry and Mental health 177
- Clinical Psychology 225
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 111
- Occupational Therapy 18
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Ames. The network helps show where Catherine Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 138 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 4 |
About Catherine Ames
Catherine Ames is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Education, having authored 12 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (340 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (177 citations), Clinical Psychology (225 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (111 citations) and Occupational Therapy (18 citations). Catherine Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sue Fletcher‐Watson, Sarah White, Patrick Bolton, Christopher Jarrold, Eleanor Leigh, Patrick Smith, Susanna Payne, Nicola Gillan, Francesca Happé and Emma Woodhouse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, BMC Geriatrics and Developmental Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.