Developmental Review

850 papers and 66.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 850 papers published in Developmental Review in the last decades have received a total of 66.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Developmental Review usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (406 papers), Social Psychology (228 papers) and Clinical Psychology (219 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Animal Learning Development (248 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (158 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Developmental Review are Laurence Steinberg, Marc H. Bornstein, Diane L. Putnick, Erika Hoff, John R. Best, Allan Wigfield, Johanna Nurmi, Corinne Zimmerman, Frank N. Dempster and Jeffrey Jensen Arnett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Developmental Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Developmental Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Developmental Review.

Countries where authors publish in Developmental Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Developmental Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Developmental Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Developmental Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025