Casey Pulliam

24 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Casey Pulliam
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 45
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 71
  • Cancer Research 27
  • Neurology 25
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 14
Replace Zheran Liu with:
Zheran Liu China
Hong Guo China
Sang Yeob Lee South Korea
Yonghong Shi China
Cristina A. Nadalutti United States
Hongyang Shu China
Yu‐Lin Kao Taiwan
Bowen Li China
Casey Pulliam relative to Zheran Liu China Zheran Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Zheran Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Casey Pulliam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Casey Pulliam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Casey Pulliam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Casey Pulliam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Casey Pulliam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Casey Pulliam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Casey Pulliam. The network helps show where Casey Pulliam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Casey Pulliam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Casey Pulliam Line = papers co-authored together Casey Pulliam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202140
2 202040
3 202239
4 201822
5 201621
6 202320
7 201716
8 201816
9 202415
10 202015
11 201914
12 201612
13 201612
14 202012
15 202212
16 202312
17 201811
18 202410
19 20189
20 20238

About Casey Pulliam

Casey Pulliam is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Epidemiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 24 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (2 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (2 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (45 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (71 citations), Cancer Research (27 citations), Neurology (25 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (14 citations). Casey Pulliam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. J. Ronis, Kelly E. Mercer, Douglas R. Spitz, Kim Brint Pedersen, Leah Hennings, Larry J. Suva, Kranti A. Mapuskar, Bryan G. Allen, Jin‐Ran Chen and Michael S. Petronek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Antioxidants, Redox Biology, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact