Caroline E. Schuster

20 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Caroline E. Schuster
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Finance 66
  • Business and International Management 12
  • Urban Studies 18
  • Anthropology 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 89
Replace Bert De Munck with:
Bert De Munck Belgium
J. L. Price United Kingdom
Andrew Reeve United Kingdom
Martin Demant Frederiksen Denmark
Julie Y. Chu United States
Eiko Ikegami United States
Christopher Powell Canada
Stephen Vlastos United States
Yann Moulier Boutang France
Emma Griffin United Kingdom
Caroline E. Schuster relative to Bert De Munck Belgium Bert De Munck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Bert De Munck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline E. Schuster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline E. Schuster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline E. Schuster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline E. Schuster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline E. Schuster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline E. Schuster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline E. Schuster. The network helps show where Caroline E. Schuster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Caroline E. Schuster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Caroline E. Schuster Line = papers co-authored together Caroline E. Schuster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201441
2 201939
3
Social Collateral: Women and Microfinance in Paraguay’s Smuggling Economy
201527
4 201724
5 201618
6 201015
7 202115
8 201114
9 201110
10 20168
11 20107
12 20197
13
Your family and friends are collateral: microfinance and the social
20156
14 20166
15 20195
16 20214
17 20214
18 20241
19 20221
20 20211

About Caroline E. Schuster

Caroline E. Schuster is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Finance and Urban Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (7 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (2 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper) and Identity, Memory, and Therapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (66 citations), Business and International Management (12 citations), Urban Studies (18 citations), Anthropology (29 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (89 citations). Caroline E. Schuster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Driscoll, Jean‐Marie Danion, Fabrice Berna, Guy Hédelin, Jack Foucher, Izzie Jacques Namer, Charles B. Pull, Robert Puskeiler, Heike Schmidt and Stefan Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Current Anthropology, Social Analysis, Cultural Anthropology, American Ethnologist and Ethnography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact