Carole E. Ames
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Insect behavior and control techniques
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Genetics top 10%
- Forensic and Genetic Research
- Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
Papers in
- Genetics 7
- Forensic and Genetic Research 6
-
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies 4
- Insect behavior and control techniques 2
- Insect and Pesticide Research 2
- Co-authors
- Bryan D. Turner (4 shared papers)Barbara E. Daniel (7 shared papers)John Burt Foster (1 shared paper)Emma Johnston (1 shared paper)Stephen Moore (2 shared papers)Kirsty J. Shaw (1 shared paper)M. de la Puente (2 shared papers)Walther Parson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forensic Science International Genetics (3 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (2 papers)Forensic Science International (2 papers)International Journal of Legal Medicine (1 paper)Medical and Veterinary Entomology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Carole E. Ames
12 papers receiving 521 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Insect Science 229
- Genetics 286
- Safety Research 58
- Ecology 115
- Small Animals 31
Countries citing papers authored by Carole E. Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of Carole E. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carole E. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carole E. Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carole E. Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carole E. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carole E. Ames. The network helps show where Carole E. Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Carole E. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 2 |
About Carole E. Ames
Carole E. Ames is a scholar working on Genetics, Insect Science, Safety Research, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (6 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (4 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (2 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (1 paper) and Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (229 citations), Genetics (286 citations), Safety Research (58 citations), Ecology (115 citations) and Small Animals (31 citations). Carole E. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bryan D. Turner, Barbara E. Daniel, John Burt Foster, Emma Johnston, Stephen Moore, Kirsty J. Shaw, M. de la Puente, Walther Parson, Ana Mosquera‐Miguel and Peter M. Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International Genetics, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International, International Journal of Legal Medicine and Medical and Veterinary Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.