Canio Noce

1.9k citations
145 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Canio Noce

136 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Canio Noce
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Condensed Matter Physics 926
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 652
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 673
  • Materials Chemistry 245
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 66
Replace P. Gandit with:
P. Gandit France
Chisa Hotta Japan
E. Sigmund Germany
J. E. Lorenzo France
Matteo Mitrano United States
Allen O. Scheie United States
Peter Vorderwisch Germany
Michael Ma United States
A. Dienst Germany
I. O. Kulik Uzbekistan
Canio Noce relative to P. Gandit France P. Gandit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.7×
P. Gandit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Canio Noce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Canio Noce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Canio Noce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canio Noce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Canio Noce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Canio Noce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Canio Noce. The network helps show where Canio Noce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Canio Noce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Canio Noce Line = papers co-authored together Canio Noce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 145 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005123
2 202255
3 202355
4 201237
5 200637
6 199936
7 200834
8 200630
9 200329
10 202127
11 200827
12 201227
13 201127
14 200126
15 201425
16 201325
17 201124
18 199820
19 201120
20 201719

About Canio Noce

Canio Noce is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 145 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (95 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (54 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (51 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (39 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (22 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (21 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (16 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (926 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (652 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (673 citations), Materials Chemistry (245 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (66 citations). Canio Noce has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Poland and China. Frequent co-authors include Mario Cuoco, Alfonso Romano, Carmine Autieri, Filomena Forte, Paola Gentile, G. Bressi, G. Carugno, Andrea Peluso, Giuseppe Cuono and Zu‐Jian Ying. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physica B Condensed Matter, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, Physical review. B. and Physica C Superconductivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact