Candice Bridge
Impact in
- Safety Research top 2%
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
- Toxicology top 2%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 17
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 17
-
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 14
- Co-authors
- Mark Marić (11 shared papers)Michael E. Sigman (5 shared papers)Edward Sisco (2 shared papers)Robert B. Cody (1 shared paper)Jean M. MacInnis (1 shared paper)Mary R. Williams (1 shared paper)Marcelo Henrique Sousa (2 shared papers)Juliano de Andrade Gomes (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forensic Science International (9 papers)Forensic Chemistry (9 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (1 paper)Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy (1 paper)Informatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Candice Bridge
31 papers receiving 587 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Safety Research 214
- Toxicology 73
- Analytical Chemistry 170
- Spectroscopy 225
- Archeology 118
Countries citing papers authored by Candice Bridge
This map shows the geographic impact of Candice Bridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candice Bridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candice Bridge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Candice Bridge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candice Bridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candice Bridge. The network helps show where Candice Bridge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Candice Bridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 9 |
About Candice Bridge
Candice Bridge is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Safety Research, Genetics, Toxicology and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 34 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (17 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (14 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (9 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (8 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (6 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (5 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (214 citations), Toxicology (73 citations), Analytical Chemistry (170 citations), Spectroscopy (225 citations) and Archeology (118 citations). Candice Bridge has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mark Marić, Michael E. Sigman, Edward Sisco, Robert B. Cody, Jean M. MacInnis, Mary R. Williams, Marcelo Henrique Sousa, Juliano de Andrade Gomes, Roman Aranda and Bianca Olivieri. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Forensic Chemistry, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy and Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.