Cade McCall

2.9k citations
58 papers · 1.9k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Cade McCall

53 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Cade McCall
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Human-Computer Interaction 340
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 465
  • Social Psychology 736
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 506
  • Applied Psychology 100
Replace Patrice Renaud with:
Patrice Renaud Canada
Alice Chirico Italy
Oswald D. Kothgassner Austria
Anna Felnhofer Austria
Matthew J. Hertenstein United States
Erika L. Rosenberg United States
Paul Whitney United States
Gianmarco Altoè Italy
Ruud Hortensius Netherlands
Chris L. Kleinke United States
Cade McCall relative to Patrice Renaud Canada Patrice Renaud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Patrice Renaud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cade McCall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cade McCall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cade McCall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cade McCall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cade McCall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cade McCall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cade McCall. The network helps show where Cade McCall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cade McCall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cade McCall Line = papers co-authored together Cade McCall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012208
2 2018170
3 2008112
4 201996
5 201690
6 200973
7 200971
8 201168
9 201763
10 200961
11 202053
12 202051
13 202045
14 201444
15 201243
16 202139
17 201538
18 201537
19 200436
20 202135

About Cade McCall

Cade McCall is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (11 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (10 papers), Media Influence and Health (10 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (8 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (340 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (465 citations), Social Psychology (736 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (506 citations) and Applied Psychology (100 citations). Cade McCall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tania Singer, Jim Blascovich, Léonore Robieux, Franck Zenasni, Jérôme Guegan, Philippe Bertrand, Susan Persky, Omri Gillath, Phillip R. Shaver and David Zendle. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Cognition & Emotion, Consciousness and Cognition, Social and Personality Psychology Compass and Computers in Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact