C. Wright Mills
Impact in
-
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
- Political Economy and Marxism
- Peacebuilding and International Security
- Digital Games and Media
Papers in
-
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice 5
- Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism 3
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 1
-
- Social Science and Policy Research 1
- Co-authors
- Thorstein Bunde Veblen (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Sociology (1 paper)Society (1 paper)Duke University Press eBooks (1 paper)Routledge eBooks (6 papers)The American Catholic Sociological Review (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
C. Wright Mills
10 papers receiving 89 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Sociology and Political Science 59
- General Social Sciences 3
- Communication 5
- Public Administration 3
- Political Science and International Relations 15
Countries citing papers authored by C. Wright Mills
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Wright Mills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Wright Mills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Wright Mills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Wright Mills
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Wright Mills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Wright Mills. The network helps show where C. Wright Mills may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside C. Wright Mills, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1958 | 35 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 19 | |
| 3 | 1960 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 6 | War and peace in Sri Lanka | 2009 | 6 |
| 7 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 9 | La imaginació sociològica | 1987 | 2 |
| 10 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | SOBRE ARTESANÍA INTELECUAL | 2010 | 0 |
| 14 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0 |
About C. Wright Mills
C. Wright Mills is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Social Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Museology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 110 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (5 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism (3 papers), Historical Economic and Legal Thought (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (1 paper), Social Science and Policy Research (1 paper) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (59 citations), General Social Sciences (3 citations), Communication (5 citations), Public Administration (3 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (15 citations). Frequent co-authors include Thorstein Bunde Veblen. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Society, Duke University Press eBooks, Routledge eBooks and The American Catholic Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.