C. William Zanner

1.0k citations
19 papers · 865 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. William Zanner

19 papers receiving 828 citations

Peers

C. William Zanner
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Atmospheric Science 476
  • Earth-Surface Processes 169
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 107
  • Soil Science 147
  • Global and Planetary Change 303
Replace Xinwen Xu with:
Xinwen Xu China
David A. Grimley United States
Leon R. Follmer United States
H. Bakker Netherlands
René Boulet Brazil
Geoff S. Humphreys Australia
André Eger New Zealand
Héctor José María Morrás Argentina
Hongya Wang China
V. O. Targulian Russia
C. William Zanner relative to Xinwen Xu China Xinwen Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Xinwen Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. William Zanner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. William Zanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. William Zanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. William Zanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. William Zanner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. William Zanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. William Zanner. The network helps show where C. William Zanner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. William Zanner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. William Zanner Line = papers co-authored together C. William Zanner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2008224
2 2005124
3 2008111
4 199997
5 200665
6 200660
7 200452
8 200520
9 199820
10 200820
11 200415
12 199513
13 200710
14 20058
15 20058
16 20057
17 20054
18
COMPARISON OF BOTANICAL COMPOSITION, SOIL CARBON CONTENT, AND ROOT DISTRIBUTION OF SUBIRRIGATED MEADOWS IN THE NEBRASKA SANDHILLS
20074
19 20053

About C. William Zanner

C. William Zanner is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Molecular Biology, Soil Science, Civil and Structural Engineering and Geophysics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (7 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (3 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (3 papers), Geological formations and processes (2 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (476 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (169 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (107 citations), Soil Science (147 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (303 citations). C. William Zanner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include C. E. Geiss, David A. Wedin, Tala Awada, Ramón Egli, Xuguo Zhou, F. Edwin Harvey, Robert C. Graham, Joseph A. Mason, Richard A. Minnich and J. C. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Soil Science Society of America Journal, Tree Physiology, Quaternary International and Geomorphology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact