C. W. E. Redman

2.5k citations
59 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

C. W. E. Redman

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

C. W. E. Redman
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Reproductive Medicine 476
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 382
  • Epidemiology 411
  • Oncology 226
  • Rheumatology 110
Replace Robert Rome with:
Robert Rome Australia
Su‐Cheng Huang Taiwan
Eva Chalas United States
J. H. Shepherd United Kingdom
Thomas Ind United Kingdom
Ole Erik Iversen Norway
Francesco Sopracordevole Italy
Robert V. Higgins United States
Giovanni Di Vagno Italy
Roberto Montera Italy
C. W. E. Redman relative to Robert Rome Australia Robert Rome's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Robert Rome · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. W. E. Redman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. W. E. Redman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. W. E. Redman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. W. E. Redman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. W. E. Redman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. W. E. Redman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. W. E. Redman. The network helps show where C. W. E. Redman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. W. E. Redman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. W. E. Redman Line = papers co-authored together C. W. E. Redman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989200
2 1993176
3 1990173
4 201286
5 198977
6 199964
7 199463
8
Association of glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes with clinical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer.
199863
9 199658
10 199956
11 199550
12 200240
13 200440
14 199338
15 200635
16 200232
17 200130
18 198929
19 199928
20 201128

About C. W. E. Redman

C. W. E. Redman is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Oncology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (16 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (8 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers) and Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (476 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (382 citations), Epidemiology (411 citations), Oncology (226 citations) and Rheumatology (110 citations). C. W. E. Redman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include G. Blackledge, David Luesley, Karen Kelly, F. Lawton, R. E. Howells, E. J. Buxton, Peter W. Jones, K. K. Dhar, Anthony A. Fryer and Richard C. Strange. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cytopathology, British Journal of Cancer and Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact