C. Tomás
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Physiology top 2%
- Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Papers in
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 22
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 18
- Co-authors
- E. Mocé (12 shared papers)Eduardo de Mercado (17 shared papers)E. Blanch (9 shared papers)J.K. Graham (4 shared papers)E. Gómez-Izquierdo (12 shared papers)Dmitri Fabrikov (8 shared papers)Fernando G. Barroso (6 shared papers)G. Cardenete (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Animal Reproduction Science (6 papers)Animals (5 papers)Aquaculture (5 papers)Reproduction in Domestic Animals (4 papers)Aquaculture International (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
C. Tomás
44 papers receiving 921 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Reproductive Medicine 462
- Physiology 174
- Aquatic Science 244
- Insect Science 233
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 394
Countries citing papers authored by C. Tomás
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Tomás's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Tomás with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Tomás more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Tomás
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Tomás. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Tomás. The network helps show where C. Tomás may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Tomás, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 140 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 59 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 16 |
About C. Tomás
C. Tomás is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Aquatic Science and Insect Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (22 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (18 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (12 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (10 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (8 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (5 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (5 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (462 citations), Physiology (174 citations), Aquatic Science (244 citations), Insect Science (233 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (394 citations). C. Tomás has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include E. Mocé, Eduardo de Mercado, E. Blanch, J.K. Graham, E. Gómez-Izquierdo, Dmitri Fabrikov, Fernando G. Barroso, G. Cardenete, María José Sánchez‐Muros and Maria Fernanda Pessoa. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Reproduction Science, Animals, Aquaculture, Reproduction in Domestic Animals and Aquaculture International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.