C. T. Meyer

433 citations
18 papers · 384 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C. T. Meyer

18 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

C. T. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Materials Chemistry 156
  • Polymers and Plastics 43
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 162
  • Bioengineering 15
  • Biomedical Engineering 111
Replace Glen C. King with:
Glen C. King United States
Luyi Huang China
Eugen Maier Austria
Tadao Edamura Japan
Saleem G. Rao Saudi Arabia
Takashi Suzuki Japan
Masahiro Morimoto Japan
Kyung Sun Park South Korea
Carl G. Zimba United States
Hongke Ye United States
C. T. Meyer relative to Glen C. King United States Glen C. King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Glen C. King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. T. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. T. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. T. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. T. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. T. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. T. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. T. Meyer. The network helps show where C. T. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside C. T. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. T. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together C. T. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2001101
2 198832
3 197930
4 198230
5 197827
6 198223
7 197621
8 198320
9 200417
10 198315
11 198014
12 198811
13 197810
14 198210
15 19789
16 19748
17 19754
18 19862

About C. T. Meyer

C. T. Meyer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics and Molecular Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (4 papers), High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (4 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (3 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (3 papers), Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation (3 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (2 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (2 papers) and Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (156 citations), Polymers and Plastics (43 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (162 citations), Bioengineering (15 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (111 citations). C. T. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J.C. Filippini, M. Pinéri, C. Trautmann, Robert H. Blick, Niels Fertig, Jan C. Behrends, A. Chamel, Matthias Maier, D. Bimberg and J.D. Cross. Their work appears in journals such as Polymer, Analytical Biochemistry, Journal of Applied Physics, Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering and Journal de physique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact