C Shuldham

9 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

C Shuldham
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 9
  • Research and Theory 6
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 181
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 22
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 59
Replace Elena M. Bosque with:
Elena M. Bosque United States
Richella Ryan United Kingdom
Petra J.E. Vos Netherlands
Charlotte Simonÿ Denmark
Melodee Harris United States
E. Lynne Geddes Canada
Enrique Fabian Fernandez United States
Lisa Jo Hopp United States
Victoria M. Lord United Kingdom
Bülent Erdur Türkiye
C Shuldham relative to Elena M. Bosque United States Elena M. Bosque's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.1×
Elena M. Bosque · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C Shuldham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Shuldham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Shuldham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Shuldham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Shuldham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Shuldham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Shuldham. The network helps show where C Shuldham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside C Shuldham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C Shuldham Line = papers co-authored together C Shuldham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2009276
2 200299
3 199536
4 201521
5 199716
6 19866
7 20045
8
Self-care behaviour and the European heart failure self-care behaviour scale, is Europe united?
20051
9
Multi-dimensional assessment of clinical dyspnoea
20071
10
Coronary artery surgery.
19840

About C Shuldham

C Shuldham is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Applied Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Social Issues and Policies (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (9 citations), Research and Theory (6 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (181 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (22 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (59 citations). C Shuldham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Iceland. Frequent co-authors include Janelle Yorke, Paul Jones, Shakeeb Hassan Moosavi, Merrill Hiscock, Hengyi Rao, Steven Denis Fleming, Helen Elizabeth Smith, Shauna L. Callaghan, Thomas L. Campbell and Margaret Lau‐Walker. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, Journal of Nursing Management, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Clinical & Experimental Allergy and Thorax.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact